WHICH protesters exactly?The part you commented on but seem to have ignored is the 'mostly' ... the protestors were towing gallows .
I agree that the ones towing the gallows deserve all the condemnation they get.They deserve all the condemnation they get.
I didn't ask you to NAME them. You could have said which GROUP. But the problem for you is you have no idea which group was doing what and you're just lumping everyone in together! The FACT remains - it was a mostly peaceful protest.so if I can't name them that proves me wrong somehow? FMD you're an idiot.
Is that you're tactic to try and claim deniability? to try and split the same bunch off protestors into different groups? Were they colour coded or something? Did they have different uniforms? How do you know who is in what group or even what the groups are exactly? As far as I'm aware, they were all there protesting the one thing so it was ALL one group.ou could have said which GROUP.
Innocent until proven guilty. You've now made it clear that you're such a ridiculous, illogical fool, that you were not exclusively talking about the ones who were carrying the gallows, but that basically anyone who was there is guilty of supporting the gallows unless they can be determined to be against it!how would you know who was supporting the gallows? Did you ask them?