OH Dear. Gladys . ?!!

pinkeye

Wonder woman
Well lots of things have been happening in Aus Politics.. but let's talk about Gladys B.

IMHO she is gone. Goodbye Gladys.

Despite her denials of knowledge of any wrongdoing, I heard a recording.. a phone tap . Recording of a conversation between her and her lover, her Numero Uno, where she was saying, in response to his comments.. please don't tell me. I don't want to know about that.

OR WORDS TO THAT EFFECT.

SO ,, she is lying when she says she had no idea.

Technically ( what's that called ..plausible deniability? ) she could say she didn't know any details, but SHE CANNOT CLAIM she was unaware that he was acting illegally. The fact she told him basically, to shut up, is proof. IMHO.

She should resign, today.
 

DonDeeHippy

Active member
Or she just didn't want know about his working life... maybe she stopped him every time he started talking about work... Do you know what is the truth Pinkie ?
 

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
Or she just didn't want know about his working life... maybe she stopped him every time he started talking about work... Do you know what is the truth Pinkie ?
She also failed to follow her OWN code of conduct. She was in a long term relationship and as such she's supposed to declare any pecuniary interests off her partner ... she failed to do so.

then there's this (copied from ozpol)

In one tapped phone call from September 2017, when Maguire talks about a deal he is doing with William Luong, she replies: “That's good, I don’t need to know about that bit.”

Robertson asked: “Weren’t you seeking to limit the amount of information you had about this deal so that you don’t have to do anything?”

Berejiklian: “If there was anything, I would have disclosed it, or reported it.

“I deny the proposition that I turned a blind eye.”

She knew he was into dodgy dealings and turned a blind eye to it. She should go.
 

HBS Guy

Head Honcho
Staff member
I know little about NSW politics.

If you want people to reply you need to make the topic interesting and maybe finish with a question? What fo you think, Pinky?
 

pinkeye

Wonder woman
I know little about NSW politics.

If you want people to reply you need to make the topic interesting and maybe finish with a question? What fo you think, Pinky?
Well she is badly compromised. It is clear she KNEW her love was engaged in nefarious activities, but she felt denying it would read better. No she must go, because what she percieves as honesty, is not what I would perceive as honesty.
She knew he was acting inappropriately, long before she SACKED him,, and then continued the relationship.?

Either way she got used and she cannot deny her culpability in assisting her lover.
 

DonDeeHippy

Active member
Well she is badly compromised. It is clear she KNEW her love was engaged in nefarious activities, but she felt denying it would read better. No she must go, because what she percieves as honesty, is not what I would perceive as honesty.
She knew he was acting inappropriately, long before she SACKED him,, and then continued the relationship.?

Either way she got used and she cannot deny her culpability in assisting her lover.
what proof is there she knew he was dodgy and they just didn't have a agreement to NEVER talk business so she couldn't be accused of what you are doing now....
If you do have proof please commit it to the inquiry because no one else does...
 

pinkeye

Wonder woman
No it is my opinion. Yes.?

She does not deserve to retain her role as the Leader of the State of New South Wales.
 

DonDeeHippy

Active member
Intercepted phone call.
that she says to her boyfriend she doesn't want to know his business dealing so there wont be a conflict of interest... that's all...there is no evidence she knew he was doing dodgy dealings, the only thing the recording shows is she was being vigilant in not being biased.....
 

johnsmith

Moderator
Staff member
what proof is there she knew he was dodgy and they just didn't have a agreement to NEVER talk business so she couldn't be accused of what you are doing now....
You'll do anything to defend a crooked lib won't you?

Pay attention to what she said.

“That's good, I don’t need to know about that bit.”

Sounds to me like she doesn't mind talking business at all, just doesn't need to know about the 'bits' that are crooked.
 

DonDeeHippy

Active member
You'll do anything to defend a crooked lib won't you?

Pay attention to what she said.

“That's good, I don’t need to know about that bit.”

Sounds to me like she doesn't mind talking business at all, just doesn't need to know about the 'bits' that are crooked.
purely your opinion...no proof, get proof an I want her out too...Witch hunts though not interested....
 

pinkeye

Wonder woman
witch hunt.?

Fuck off.

I know that is a term favored by Trump, but honestly, that offends me. The proof is in her own words.
I can't explain why you see her words as innocence personified. 🐰
 

DonDeeHippy

Active member
witch hunt.?

Fuck off.

I know that is a term favored by Trump, but honestly, that offends me. The proof is in her own words.
I can't explain why you see her words as innocence personified. 🐰
what words ??????
you mean these
“That's good, I don’t need to know about that bit.”
did she say that every time he mentioned business.... Is that the "bit" she means ?
She could very well be dodgy, but that line means nothing without context, sorry....


proof or it's a witch hunt...........
 

pinkeye

Wonder woman
It is all on the record.. whenever that is available, if ever, who knows..?? you want to suggest nothing is wrong .. but I say again.
In my opinion she should NOT continue as Premier of NSW.

Why you think
I can prove anything
from my PC
is beyond me.
 

DonDeeHippy

Active member
It is all on the record.. whenever that is available, if ever, who knows..?? you want to suggest nothing is wrong .. but I say again.
In my opinion she should NOT continue as Premier of NSW.

Why you think
I can prove anything
from my PC
is beyond me.
yes it's your opinion based on Nothing but one sentence from a phone call that is VERY inconclusive... how progressive of you...
you want her out because of a failed private relationship, you do realize this ?????
She was taken advantage of, she says. That is likely true. It means, though, that she is not fit to be Premier.
Not because of her job performance.....
(just like those that brought up gillards private dealings)

As for your PC
Heard of Google ?
you cant proof anything because there IS NO PROOF.......
 
Last edited:
Top