chris155au
Active member
Them most important for what? For determining if people think that a PM is "good?" Remember, that is what we are talking about here.
Morrison defends mostly peaceful protesters - the left loose their minds!
- Thread starter chris155au
- Start date
chris155au
Active member
Criminally guilty, or morally guilty?
how does preferred Pm tell you if he is good? Is that what you tell yourself?
If I ask you in a poll to vote for dying by arsenic or dying by car crash, does that mean you think either is good? Or might you prefer to not die but as that wasn't an option you went with A or B?
If people thought he was a good PM his party would be winning the 2PP polling. Don't forget, elections are for governments to loose, not oppositions to win. If people think govt. is doing a good job no opposition would ever win an election.
chris155au
Active member
Alright. Reasonable point.
Shouldn't the preferred PM's party be winning the 2PP polling? Maybe it just points to how utterly inadequate polling is.
For decades preferred PM wasn't even looked at until the libs and their monkeys started pushing it to, at various stages, hide their flailing popularity over the years. It is meaningless for reasons I've already explained. The only true indicator is the 2PP ... and even that is not always right.
chris155au
Active member
Meaningless because it's inaccurate?
meaningless because it's meaningless
chris155au
Active member
If BOTH are accurate, then the preferred PM's party should be winning the 2PP polling. So at least one must be useless.
you don't listen very well do you. It's not inacurate, it's fucking meaningless. Prefered PM is not in any way an indicator of how people will vote and it never has been.
chris155au
Active member
Okay, but does this mean that people who say who their preferred PM is could easily vote for the other party?
absolutely it does.
Shellandshilo1956
Active member
Politicians don't actually lie. They simply speak a nonsense language, that accommodates for all creative political narratives(lies).
And just when you were doing so well with being honest!! I DO think that an employer who fires an employee for NOT providing evidence of being vaccinated, is doing so specifically because the employee is NOT providing proof of vaccination. And, because this is the new mandate by the Government. No Jab No Job!!
If an employee is "bonking" the boss's wife, is stealing from the company, is a racist or misogynist, or is violating other company or criminal laws, the employee might also be fired. But of course, these are NOT the people I was talking about, right?
chris155au
Active member
Does that make sense to you that people would do that?
chris155au
Active member
Trump never lied?
I have no idea what you're referring to. How am I not being honest?
Maybe I can phrase it in a different way: Surely you don't think that no employer has adopted their own voluntary vaccine mandate policy.
you realise the people that they poll don't write the questions right?
what planet have you been living on?
chris155au
Active member
Of course. What's your point?
For fuck’s sake…learn some English…! It’s LOSE, not LOOSE..!
“Loose” are the one or two brain cells you have bouncing around in your skull…
chris155au
Active member
You're clearly a Labor supporter and are hurt by what I said about the USELESS Shorten, and you have nothing to say other than some grammar police crap!
I'll repeat it for you: meanwhile it's only the BEST who rise to the top in the Labor party like Shorten even though he managed to lose two elections!
